I know it is an minor thing, but the creation act that the new keyword
exposes, the 'of' method don't has. IMO the simple fact of an method name
does not contain an verb is an anti-pattern.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:50 PM, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> im +1, unless Jeremy can tell why he believes it will hit a anti patter..
>
> 2009/11/16 Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com>
>
> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst <
> > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > i.e. ModelType.of(....)
> > >
> > > I am +1 for adding these methods.
> > >
> >
> > I'm +1 for the model-type methods, although there are so many models that
> > are not final classes that it really won't save tons of code. Mainly in
> > the
> > *PropertyModel family.
> >
> >
> > > We can do the same for components, although the benefit is typically
> > > less, and it might even send our users down the wrong path thinking
> > > they can't use the 'new' keyword.
> > >
> > > TextField<String> field = TextField.of("someId", PropertyModel.of(foo,
> > > "property"));
> > >
> >
> > I'm -1 on doing it for components. I think it will lead to an
> > anti-pattern.
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
>
--
Pedro Henrique Oliveira dos Santos
