> [ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket > [x] keep Wicket security at Wicket Stuff
I am biased, yes, but I much prefer Shiro in my Wicket apps too :) - Les On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Martin Grigorov <mcgreg...@e-card.bg> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:52 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote: >> Guys, >> >> I'd like to discuss the future of the Wicket Security project. >> Currently the project lives on/in the wicketstuff repository, but uses >> group id and package names "org.apache.wicket". IMO We should either: >> >> - adopt Wicket Security into the Wicket project and move everything >> over from Wicket Stuff into a subproject within Apache Wicket (and >> adopt the committers), or >> - keep Wicket Security at wicketstuff and move it into the fold of >> wicket stuff, including groupid/package rename. >> >> Since development on wicket security 1.4 is currently happening with a >> 1.4-beta1 just released, it is prudent to decide its future now (with >> a pending package rename). >> >> Considering that both the wicket security contributors and the Wicket >> PMC members are needed to make this happen, all their opinions are >> considered binding. >> >> [ ] adopt Wicket security into Apache Wicket >> [x] keep Wicket security at Wicket Stuff > I haven't seen in the mailing lists many users of it. Most of them use > Spring Security (my statistics). > > I think there is no need to add one more thing to support by the core > committers. > > P.S. I personally prefer Shiro. >> >> Martijn >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > >
