On 19/05/2010 14:49, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
How about we put the request back on you:
Please prove that WICKET-2846 DOES introduce a nasty regression.
This is much easier to prove / disprove than what you request.
Jeremy, as an open source developer, I understand your position and what
you said. However, I also understand that the Wicket team could consider
the problem I'm bringing to you. I'm sure your team could understand
what I said, and may explain if I'm wrong. My experience with this,
however, is that it make Wicket another piece of the stack to introduce
an evil problem.
See the bug I shown, for example. Guice team just make they counterpart
open till now. Wicket could do the same, but as this is a new
"improvement", it looks for me that its consequence was not well know,
as this isn't essential for the framework.
As a user, needing to do our applications, we haven't even time to
upgrade, so we're still in 1.4.1.
As my vote didn't really count (it's non binding, after all), voting
against is just a way to show my in-satisfaction with something I
considered a problem. Note that I have (re)opened bug reports that
matter for us, and I'm not one that vote against due to it.
Adriano
