> > > To clarify this, I use Application.set and Application.unset there. > Although public, they're "not part of Wicket public API". So IMO, the > initial issue would be better done making these methods part of the public > API. > > And then people all over will have memory leak issues because they'll forget a finally block. We tell you those are not part of the public API because you should *not* use them. If you want to use them that way, then fine, but you have to deal with the consequences - not us.
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Application in Inheri... Alex Objelean
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Application in I... Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Application ... Alex Objelean
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Applicat... Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... tetsuo
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... Johan Compagner
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... James Carman
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... Jeremy Thomerson
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... James Carman
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... Martijn Dashorst
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... James Carman
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... James Carman
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... Igor Vaynberg
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... Igor Vaynberg
- Re: WICKET-2846 - Store Appl... Johan Compagner