Are you sure ?
I have never used something like this but it sounds bad.
I commit something and then when I open the logs I see something different
(my change + some formatting).
This way the history is totally messed up.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Peter Ertl <pe...@gmx.org> wrote:

> +1 on commit-hook-based code formatting
>
> Am 07.04.2011 um 18:06 schrieb Hans Lesmeister 2:
>
> >
> > Martin Grigorov-4 wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Hans Lesmeister 2 <
> >> hans.lesmeis...@lessy-software.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>> IMHO Formatting should be done on commit.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I guess you don't follow your colleagues work using email notifications.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I am not sure if I know what you mean by that. With "on commit" I meant
> on
> > the server, in this case the Git-Server. That way everybody can format
> the
> > way he or she likes.
> >
> > -----
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hans
> >
> > http://cantaa.de
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicketstuff-1-5-Code-formatting-tp3432552p3433858.html
> > Sent from the Forum for Wicket Core developers mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>

Reply via email to