Hi,
I remember Igor explained that Brix uses its own mechanism for url
mapping. It doesn't use Wicket's IRequestMapper, or at least it
doesn't use Wicket's default HttpsMapper.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Korbinian Bachl - privat
<korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
>
>> instance from it and visit its components to decide whether you need
>> Scheme.HTTPS. Annotating the component will do the job.
>
> Sorry but with Brix annotating isnt possible as the page itself needs to
> decide if it needs SSL or not?
How the page will use this knowledge ? I.e. what should happen when
the page knows that it should redirect to https ?
>
> Did I get you wrong?
My idea is to provide custom HttpsMapper that checks the components
(or tiles) in the page instead of the page itself as the default
HttpsMapper does with @RequireHttps.
You can create a special interface (e.g. MyInterface {Scheme
getScheme(); } ) and your components/tiles which need to be served
with https can implement it and return Scheme.HTTPS.
>
> My plan is to get an Brix 6.0 out for wicket 6.0 as I want to shift our brix
> app up to wicket 6.0 - but the SSL thing keeps making me headaches...
>
> Best
>
>
>
>
> Am 13.06.12 11:54, schrieb Martin Grigorov:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The change list is f3defe9ec3e2113c4fa81182e864f7ffba798ea8
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/f3defe9ec3e2113c4fa81182e864f7ffba798ea8
>>
>> You can override
>>
>> org.apache.wicket.protocol.https.HttpsMapper#getDesiredSchemeFor(IRequestHandler).
>> If IRequestHandler is IPageRequestHandler then you can get the page
>> instance from it and visit its components to decide whether you need
>> Scheme.HTTPS. Annotating the component will do the job.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Korbinian Bachl - privat
>> <korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> is it possible in wicket 6.0 to programatically switch to SSL mode? -
>>> I've
>>> read that according to the wiki:
>>> "HttpsMapper has been refactored to make subclassing easier" - but
>>> couldnt
>>> find the jira for it?
>>>
>>> Reason why I'm asking is that I'm trying to get Brix CMS working with
>>> wicket
>>> 5 or 6 and all time I'm hitting the wall when I need to tell wicket that
>>> this page now (!) is SSL required while next isn't (Hint to people
>>> unfamiliar with brix: all content is provided by same page creating its
>>> content from an jcr - so annotating the page @RequireHttps isn't possible
>>> -
>>> instead the decision if SSL or not needs to be calculated on every page
>>> instance rendering depending on the content);
>>>
>>> What about the idea to give Component an overridiable enum var like:
>>>
>>> ENUM Component.RequireqProtocol {
>>> sslNotRequired, sslRequired, protocolPreserved
>>> }
>>>
>>> public Component.RequiredProtocol getSecurityRequirement() {
>>> return Component.RequiredProtocol.protocolPreserved;
>>> }
>>>
>>> And anyone who needs it can just override it? - Compared to the
>>> annotation
>>> approach this can be implemented in a logic sensitive way if needed....
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> KB
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
