+1 for the 6.7.0 release on Friday. __ Cedric Gatay (@Cedric_Gatay <http://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay>) http://code-troopers.com | http://www.bloggure.info | http://cedric.gatay.fr
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>wrote: > +1 for keeping the schedule and release it on Friday. > > as this release instance has failed, and a couple of weeks have gone by >> due >> to flu and catching up on work related projects, shall I craft a 6.7.0 >> release now or shall I wait until friday and continue our release schedule >> (but release 6.7 instead of the scheduled 6.8?) >> >> My preference is wait until friday and maintaining the schedule. >> >> I don't have any objection of new stuff entering this particular release— >> I >> think 6.7.0 was just delayed a month due to unforeseen circumstances. >> >> Martijn >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Martijn Dashorst < >> martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Martijn Dashorst >>> <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Well the vote didn't pass (didn't reach the required 3 +1 >>>> votes/majority), so there's no reason (yet) for a 6.7.1. Need to >>>> re-roll 6.7.0 and restart the vote. >>>> >>> Also, I'm on a short holiday and don't know if I have the time to roll >>> another release (6.7.0 or 6.7.1) until tuesday. My guess is there's no >>> actual rush to get it out, other than striving to maintain the >>> schedule. >>> >>> Martijn >>> >>> >> >> >
