Hi,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Emond Papegaaij <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Bernard, > > I was not totally convinced of the solution, so I started a thread here, > hoping to get some feedback. However, I did not get the feedback I wanted. > Martijn did start a really good proposal to fix PageParameters the right > way, but this issue got forgotten. I've rebased the wicket-4997 branch > against wicket-6.x. If I get no objections here, I'll merge it back in this > week. > I do have objections. 1) I prefer such changes that may affect the core functionality to go in the non-stable branch first. Since you do not test the voted releases with your applications I am against merging it directly in 6.x As one of the few people working on 7.x I prefer to debug any problems that may occur with this change in my small applications instead of compromising the stable branch and my main/dailyjob application. 2) the second reason to be against is that the release of 6.12 is postponed 3 weeks without any indications when it will be cut. I don't want something like this to be merged in 6.x this Thursday and 6.12 to be cut on the following day > > Best regards, > Emond > > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Bernard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Emond has done a lot of work in August to fix this in the 6.x branch. > > I am happy with it. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bernard > > >
