On Monday 28 October 2013 10:35:26 Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Emond Papegaaij <[email protected] > > wrote: > > > > Hi Bernard, > > > > I was not totally convinced of the solution, so I started a thread here, > > hoping to get some feedback. However, I did not get the feedback I wanted. > > Martijn did start a really good proposal to fix PageParameters the right > > way, but this issue got forgotten. I've rebased the wicket-4997 branch > > against wicket-6.x. If I get no objections here, I'll merge it back in > > this > > week. > > I do have objections. > > 1) I prefer such changes that may affect the core functionality to go in > the non-stable branch first. > Since you do not test the voted releases with your applications I am > against merging it directly in 6.x > > As one of the few people working on 7.x I prefer to debug any problems that > may occur with this change in my small applications instead of > compromising the stable branch and my main/dailyjob application.
Ok, that seems reasonable. I'll merge the branch in 7.x first. > 2) the second reason to be against is that the release of 6.12 is postponed > 3 weeks without any indications when it will be cut. > I don't want something like this to be merged in 6.x this Thursday and 6.12 > to be cut on the following day I'll ask Martijn what happened with the release schedule. If I merge the branch in 7.x first, and merge it in 6.x just after the 6.12 release, would that be ok for you? Best regards, Emond
