If signing the CLA raises the chance that the author info doesn't get lost, quite some people might be interested in doing so.
mf Am 13.02.2014 um 13:40 schrieb Martijn Dashorst <[email protected]>: > As long as the PR is recorded on a wicket.apache.org list (for wicket PR's > of course), it should be OK-provided the patch is small. This could be > dev@or commits@. > It should be traceable on Apache controlled hardware. > > If anyone wishes to contribute often, it would be easier to send a signed > CLA to the secretary. Whgen the contributions continue and become more > contrived, the path to committership is already paved then. > > Note that The Apache Software Foundation licenses the code from you, you > keep copyright on the original-there is NO copyright assignment when > signing and submitting the CLA. > > Martijn > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>wrote: > >> compare to: >> wget http://.../pr/8.patch >> git am 8.patch >> git commit -a && git push >> >> >> both can be automated with some .sh script but GitHub UI is not very >> friendly - it doesn't give you easy way to copy the author's name and her >> branch >> >> I tried once https://github.com/github/hub but it failed too ... >> >> I just haven't tried hard enough ... >> >> >> Apache Org says: if the patch is not very big then just the fact that the >> user created PR is enough to give up her ownership >> if the patch is rather big then Apache requires signed CLA before merging >> the code >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Martin Funk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> several steps???? >>> >>> git remote add foo <git-repo-url> >>> git fetch foo >>> git checkout -b foo/<branch-witch-patch> >>> git rebase master >>> git checkout master >>> git merge foo/<branch-with-patch> >>> git push ... >>> >>> >>> either way, what is the Apache policy on that? Shouldn't each and every >>> code snipped be signed of to meet Apache Licence???? >>> >>> >>> mf >>> Am 12.02.2014 um 21:44 schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Martin Funk <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Pull Requests are still not supported. >>>>> But they could be pulled to local and then pushed to the apache repo >> by >>>>> core commiters, right? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Right, but it involves "manual" work in several steps. >>>> For me the easiest way is to add '.patch' to the PR url, download it >> and >>>> 'git am' it. This losses the author info though... >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> mf >>>>> >>>>> Am 12.02.2014 um 09:52 schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected] >>> : >>>>> >>>>>> Don't get too excited :) >>>>>> It is just about mail notifications and comments in JIRA/GitHub. >>>>>> Pull Requests are still not supported. >>>>>> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Santo Raso <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Finally!!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2014-02-12 9:00 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Thomerson < >> [email protected] >>>> : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Martin Grigorov < >>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just noticed >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We want all of it, right ?! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson >>>>>>>> http://wickettraining.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
