signing a CLA is for Apache's secretary
I doubt they will merge your patches :)

I will write the script soon

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting


On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Martin Funk <mafulaf...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If signing the CLA raises the chance that the author info doesn't get
> lost, quite some
> people might be interested in doing so.
>
> mf
>
> Am 13.02.2014 um 13:40 schrieb Martijn Dashorst <
> martijn.dasho...@gmail.com>:
>
> > As long as the PR is recorded on a wicket.apache.org list (for wicket
> PR's
> > of course), it should be OK-provided the patch is small. This could be
> > dev@or commits@.
> > It should be traceable on Apache controlled hardware.
> >
> > If anyone wishes to contribute often, it would be easier to send a signed
> > CLA to the secretary. Whgen the contributions continue and become more
> > contrived, the path to committership is already paved then.
> >
> > Note that The Apache Software Foundation licenses the code from you, you
> > keep copyright on the original-there is NO copyright assignment when
> > signing and submitting the CLA.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org
> >wrote:
> >
> >> compare to:
> >> wget http://.../pr/8.patch
> >> git am 8.patch
> >> git commit -a && git push
> >>
> >>
> >> both can be automated with some .sh script but GitHub UI is not very
> >> friendly - it doesn't give you easy way to copy the author's name and
> her
> >> branch
> >>
> >> I tried once https://github.com/github/hub but it failed too ...
> >>
> >> I just haven't tried hard enough ...
> >>
> >>
> >> Apache Org says: if the patch is not very big then just the fact that
> the
> >> user created PR is enough to give up her ownership
> >> if the patch is rather big then Apache requires signed CLA before
> merging
> >> the code
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Martin Funk <mafulaf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> several steps????
> >>>
> >>> git remote add foo <git-repo-url>
> >>> git fetch foo
> >>> git checkout -b foo/<branch-witch-patch>
> >>> git rebase master
> >>> git checkout master
> >>> git merge foo/<branch-with-patch>
> >>> git push ...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> either way, what is the Apache policy on that? Shouldn't each and every
> >>> code snipped be signed of to meet Apache Licence????
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> mf
> >>> Am 12.02.2014 um 21:44 schrieb Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>:
> >>>
> >>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Martin Funk <mafulaf...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Pull Requests are still not supported.
> >>>>> But they could be pulled to local and then pushed to the apache repo
> >> by
> >>>>> core commiters, right?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Right, but it involves "manual" work in several steps.
> >>>> For me the easiest way is to add '.patch' to the PR url, download it
> >> and
> >>>> 'git am' it. This losses the author info though...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> mf
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am 12.02.2014 um 09:52 schrieb Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org
> >>> :
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Don't get too excited :)
> >>>>>> It is just about mail notifications and comments in JIRA/GitHub.
> >>>>>> Pull Requests are still not supported.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Santo Raso <omgan...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Finally!!!!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2014-02-12 9:00 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Thomerson <
> >> jer...@wickettraining.com
> >>>> :
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>> mgrigo...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Just noticed
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> We want all of it, right ?!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson
> >>>>>>>> http://wickettraining.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>
>

Reply via email to