I agree Additionally wicket-jquery-ui extends DateTextField to provide date picker
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Those who are not inside org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui :-). Five > classes: > > /wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ > datetime/DateConverter.java > /wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ > datetime/PatternDateConverter.java > /wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ > datetime/StyleDateConverter.java > /wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ > datetime/markup/html/basic/DateLabel.java > /wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ > datetime/markup/html/form/DateTextField.java > > I see no reason to externalize them in a wicketstuff module. They have > nothing to do with yui. > Maybe the last two classes should go in the core module under > org.apache.wicket.markup.html. > > Please be more detailed when you have to say something. >> Which classes ? >> Why do you want to keep them around ? >> >> Such minor useful things. >> Thank you! >> >> Martin Grigorov >> Wicket Training and Consulting >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >> >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I'm OK with that :) >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I half agree with this. We should move yui to wicketstuff but I'd rather >>>> move the rest of datetime (few classes) under wicket-util. >>>> >>>> One thing >>>>> Maybe it make sense to move org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui to >>>>> wicketstuff >>>>> but leave org.apache.wicket.datetime as is? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Emond Papegaaij < >>>>> emond.papega...@topicus.nl> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >>> > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
