I think it will be this way: 1. Move the old site to apache site git repo (only copy all related stuff from SVN to GIT repo) - I personally don't know if it will be a mirrored one like wicket/core (@martijn / @martin - will it be mirrored?)
2. If the new design has been finished - replace the site by the one of dashorst/wicket-site - this is the current main repo of the redesign right? (copy from GIT repo to apache site GIT repo) kind regards Tobias > Am 09.05.2015 um 03:06 schrieb Chris Colman <chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com>: > > Does this have any consequences for the project to redesign the Wicket > website? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3341 > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: andrea del bene [mailto:an.delb...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, 8 May 2015 10:21 PM >> To: dev@wicket.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Move site to gitpubsub? >> >> Absolutely nothing for me. >> >>> On 08/05/2015 14:04, Martin Grigorov wrote: >>> I didn't notice when INFRA solved the ticket (on the same day!). >>> Does anyone have any pending changes in his local SVN working > directory? >>> Andrea? Tobias? >>> When there are no pending changes we can move the sources to the new > Git >>> repo. >>> >>> Martin Grigorov >>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Martin Grigorov > <mgrigo...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >
