On May 9, 2015 7:16 AM, "Tobias Soloschenko" < tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I think it will be this way: > > 1. Move the old site to apache site git repo (only copy all related stuff from SVN to GIT repo) - I personally don't know if it will be a mirrored one like wicket/core (@martijn / @martin - will it be mirrored?)
Mirrored to GitHub? Yes - .../apache/wicket-site > > 2. If the new design has been finished - replace the site by the one of dashorst/wicket-site - this is the current main repo of the redesign right? (copy from GIT repo to apache site GIT repo) It is not finished afaik. > > kind regards > > Tobias > > > Am 09.05.2015 um 03:06 schrieb Chris Colman < chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com>: > > > > Does this have any consequences for the project to redesign the Wicket > > website? > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3341 > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: andrea del bene [mailto:an.delb...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Friday, 8 May 2015 10:21 PM > >> To: dev@wicket.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Move site to gitpubsub? > >> > >> Absolutely nothing for me. > >> > >>> On 08/05/2015 14:04, Martin Grigorov wrote: > >>> I didn't notice when INFRA solved the ticket (on the same day!). > >>> Does anyone have any pending changes in his local SVN working > > directory? > >>> Andrea? Tobias? > >>> When there are no pending changes we can move the sources to the new > > Git > >>> repo. > >>> > >>> Martin Grigorov > >>> Wicket Training and Consulting > >>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Martin Grigorov > > <mgrigo...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >
