Last time when there was such problem I've reported it to Log4j team (as a
good Apache fellow :-) ).
IMO it is a new regression on their side.

But if we have to add yet another dependency to our pom and extra servlet
configurations for log4k-web then I'm favour to switch to logback!

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Francois Meillet <
francois.meil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Was log4j-web jar included ?
> https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/webapp.html
>
> François
>
>
> > Le 12 janv. 2018 à 18:34, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> >
> > The issue was solved after log4j was replaces with logback
> > I can create PR with this change, is this OK?
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I can confirm "Reload" of "vanilla" quick-start application in Tomcat
> >> caused memory leak (reported using "Find leak" button)
> >> Same time this is fixed after removing log4j-*.jar from WEB-INF/lib
> >> fixes this issue
> >>
> >> I'll check if this is reproducible using logback ...
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:09 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> According to [1] the behavior I'm observing is correct: "As of Maven
> >>> Archetype Plugin 3.0.0 the archetype resolution has changed. It is not
> >>> possible anymore to specify the repository via the commandline"
> >>>
> >>> @Andrea maybe you have custom settings.xml ?
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://maven.apache.org/archetype/maven-archetype-
> plugin/archetype-repository.html
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Good to know, will try to investigate why it fail for me ...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:40 PM, Andrea Del Bene <
> an.delb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> I've tried to run the generate quickstart command after deleting the
> local
> >>>>> repository as you suggested but I didn't have any problem :-/.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 12/01/2018 15:18, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> According to
> >>>>>> https://maven.apache.org/archetype/maven-archetype-
> plugin/generate-mojo.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -DarchetypeRepository=https://repository.apache.org/content/
> repositories/snapshots/
> >>>>>> is not valid attribute for archetype:generate
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is why I'm getting
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The desired archetype does not exist
> >>>>>> (org.apache.wicket:wicket-archetype-quickstart:8.0.0-SNAPSHOT)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> error after deleting ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/wicket
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is it known issue?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 8:27 PM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Andrea,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Actually, I still have the memory leak issue on my Tomcat server
> using
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> wicket-jquery-ui samples. I've to restart once a week... :(
> >>>>>>> I thought it could come from the debug-bar so I've removed it, but
> the
> >>>>>>> problem still persists and logs are not useful at this point (only
> that
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> server is dying...)
> >>>>>>> I need to find a way to increase logs and/or investigate this
> deeper...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I also wanted to deploy my wicket 7.x because it used to be very
> stable
> >>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>> that time, I will try this asap...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Sebastien.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Andrea Del Bene <
> an.delb...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I've noticed that with a quickstart project and with a permanent
> >>>>>>>> session,
> >>>>>>>> with Tomcat I get the same behavior described here
> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6046.
> >>>>>>>> Is something we should worry about?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Andrea.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> WBR
> >>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> WBR
> >>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> WBR
> >> Maxim aka solomax
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
>
>

Reply via email to