Just have tested everything works for me when maven-archetype-plugin version is being set to 2.4 like this:
mvn org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-archetype-plugin:2.4:generate -DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.wicket -DarchetypeArtifactId=wicket-archetype-quickstart -DarchetypeVersion=8.0.0-SNAPSHOT -DgroupId=org.apache.solomax -DartifactId=test-proj -DarchetypeRepository=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/ -DinteractiveMode=false On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/257 > > On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 3:10 AM, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> @Maxim, please go ahead with the PR. Thank you! >> >> >> On 12/01/2018 18:34, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>> >>> The issue was solved after log4j was replaces with logback >>> I can create PR with this change, is this OK? >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I can confirm "Reload" of "vanilla" quick-start application in Tomcat >>>> caused memory leak (reported using "Find leak" button) >>>> Same time this is fixed after removing log4j-*.jar from WEB-INF/lib >>>> fixes this issue >>>> >>>> I'll check if this is reproducible using logback ... >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:09 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> According to [1] the behavior I'm observing is correct: "As of Maven >>>>> Archetype Plugin 3.0.0 the archetype resolution has changed. It is not >>>>> possible anymore to specify the repository via the commandline" >>>>> >>>>> @Andrea maybe you have custom settings.xml ? >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://maven.apache.org/archetype/maven-archetype-plugin/archetype-repository.html >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Good to know, will try to investigate why it fail for me ... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:40 PM, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've tried to run the generate quickstart command after deleting the >>>>>>> local >>>>>>> repository as you suggested but I didn't have any problem :-/. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/01/2018 15:18, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello All, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> According to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://maven.apache.org/archetype/maven-archetype-plugin/generate-mojo.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -DarchetypeRepository=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/ >>>>>>>> is not valid attribute for archetype:generate >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is why I'm getting >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The desired archetype does not exist >>>>>>>> (org.apache.wicket:wicket-archetype-quickstart:8.0.0-SNAPSHOT) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> error after deleting ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/wicket >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is it known issue? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 8:27 PM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Actually, I still have the memory leak issue on my Tomcat server >>>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> wicket-jquery-ui samples. I've to restart once a week... :( >>>>>>>>> I thought it could come from the debug-bar so I've removed it, but >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> problem still persists and logs are not useful at this point (only >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> server is dying...) >>>>>>>>> I need to find a way to increase logs and/or investigate this >>>>>>>>> deeper... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I also wanted to deploy my wicket 7.x because it used to be very >>>>>>>>> stable >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>> that time, I will try this asap... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Sebastien. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Andrea Del Bene >>>>>>>>> <an.delb...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've noticed that with a quickstart project and with a permanent >>>>>>>>>> session, >>>>>>>>>> with Tomcat I get the same behavior described here >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6046. >>>>>>>>>> Is something we should worry about? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Andrea. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> WBR >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> WBR >>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> WBR >>>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
