Another interesting source for official statements/answers is the article I
linked at the bottom of this message. It contains some good (and funny)
critics to REST and what it promises to deliver.

https://medium.freecodecamp.org/rest-is-the-new-soap-97ff6c09896d

On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Korbinian Bachl <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Kamil,
>
> be careful when using this feature in production as there is a race
> condition meaning it depends on network, browser and client thread count if
> it works or not.
>
>
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "Kamil Paśko" <[email protected]>
> > An: [email protected]
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Februar 2018 21:31:43
> > Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers
>
> > +1
> >
> > I could test this "deferred javascript" issue on real application
> >
> >
> >> I'm for a new release too. We have a lot of fixes to release also for
> 7.x
> >> branch.
> >>
> >> On Feb 3, 2018 11:50 AM, "Martin Grigorov" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Feb 3, 2018 09:03, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
> >>>
> >>> Not sure if I can do more for the site update :(
> >>>
> >>> @Martijn maybe you can provide text for the upcoming release?
> >>>
> >>> @All, I'm not real fan of it, but maybe it worth to release another
> "M"?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I think it would be better to release another M or RC because there
> were
> >>> some bigger changes lately.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> WBR, Maxim
> >>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018, 16:25 Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've updated copyright year. You don't see 2018 post because it has a
> >>>> future date, but you can use flag future:true to show it.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> [email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have question regarding site generation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have added following file: 2018/_posts/2018-02-12-wicket-
> >>>>> 8.0.0-released.md
> >>>>> But news for 2018 are not being generated
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is there any debugger I can use?
> >>>>> Or maybe I miss something?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Copyright year is also 2017 :(
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:09 AM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Korbinian,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> no problem at all!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> With the new JavaScriptFilteredHeaderResponse we can continue to
> >>>> improve
> >>>>>> deferred loading, without having to change anything in Wicket's core
> >>>> Ajax
> >>>>>> handling.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sven
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 01.02.2018 um 17:39 schrieb Korbinian Bachl:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Im really sorry Sven but I broke your defer patch :/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> see comment here:
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A solution to it is provided :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Von: "Sven Meier" <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>> An: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2018 14:15:11
> >>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Am I right thinking Wicket 1.5 will be discontinued and Wicket6
> >>> will
> >>>> be
> >>>>>>>> moved to "security updates only" mode?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes I think so.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sven
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ⁣Gesendet mit Blue
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Am 1. Feb. 2018, 14:00, um 14:00, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>> schrieb:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have created wicket-8 branch in wicket-site repository.
> >>>>>>>>> I believe the main work should be done in 2018/_posts/
> >>>>>>>>> 2018-02-12-wicket-8.0.0-released.md file (I optimistically
> >>> "guess"
> >>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>> date to be 2018-02-12 :))
> >>>>>>>>> Weanwhile I'll update quickstart generator so it will work with
> >>>>>>>>> "archetype:generate" 3.0.0+ and snapshot builds
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Am I right thinking Wicket 1.5 will be discontinued and Wicket6
> >>> will
> >>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>> moved to "security updates only" mode?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Andrea Del Bene <
> >>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>> I've updated Confluence page to elaborate an answer to  "Not
> >>>> blocking
> >>>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> really important" TODOs for Wicket 8. The page is here
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/ToDo+
> >>>>>>>>> before+GA+release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Please consider to work directly on my comment
> >>> integrating/changing
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> content of my post. This should help to come out with a final
> >>>> version
> >>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> our official announcement.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Andrea Del Bene
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Just seen it :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2018 20:21, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> https://dzone.com/articles/would-you-use-jsf-for-your-next-project
> >>>>>>>>>>>> This might be used for inspiration for possible questions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Andrea Del Bene
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've created a Confluence page to collect some ideas on the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> non-technical
> >>>>>>>>>>> tasks we should accomplish before going to roll out Wicket 8.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've
> >>>>>>>>>> started
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> with some personal thoughts on topic 'JS vs Wicket'. Please
> >>> take
> >>>>>>>>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> raw sketch, something to use for further and better exposed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> considerations
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/ToDo+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> before+GA+release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andrea Del Bene
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Uh sorry, I'm already able to create/edit pages.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Andrea Del Bene <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather use Confluence but I think I don't have enough
> >>>> rights
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> create a page. Who can grant them?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can use JIRA for this too.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Andrea Del Bene <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could it be a good idea to create a shared document (for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example on
> >>>>>>>>>> Google
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Docs) to start working on non-technical questions?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not blocking but really important:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - have a story to answer "Why not just use XXX.js?"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - have a story to answer "Isn't Java Server Side
> >>> frameworks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dead?"
> >>>>>>>>>> - have a story to answer "Isn't Java dead"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a call list for when a reporter wants to have
> >>> contact
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>> Wicket 8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and its future (esp. related to questions above)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other things to consider:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://wicketinaction.com
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> WBR
> >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>

Reply via email to