Yes it is a very short description. So what I meant is that the client side uses the dynamic proxy which executes a rest action against the server and hand over class / parameters to the endpoint. The repsonse is automatically transfered into the business object with JSON. The server however accept the rest call and delegate everything to a given service by class / parameters. The response is sent to the client. RESTRPC. :-)
And I mixed up CRUD with feign client: https://projects.spring.io/spring-cloud/spring-cloud.html#spring-cloud-feign kind regards Tobias > Am 06.02.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>: > > On Feb 6, 2018 21:45, "Tobias Soloschenko" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > I also like REST in combination with type safe interfaces. > > So what to do: > > 1. Put the type safe interfaces and transfer objects into a shared project > > 2. Build a rest call within a dynamic proxy (https://docs.oracle.com/ > javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/reflection/proxy.html) with all required > handlings at one place - JSON can be used as serializer / deserializer to > the transfer objects > > 3. Invoke and have fun ;-) > > I think that is basically all what the spring framework CRUD > implementations are (of course with a bit more spring magic) > > > Which Spring CRUD implementations do you mean? > > Your explanation above is closer to RPC than to REST. > But the explanation is too short so I might have misunderstood you. > > > kind regards > > Tobias > >> Am 05.02.2018 um 11:39 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>: >> >> Another interesting source for official statements/answers is the article > I >> linked at the bottom of this message. It contains some good (and funny) >> critics to REST and what it promises to deliver. >> >> https://medium.freecodecamp.org/rest-is-the-new-soap-97ff6c09896d >> >> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Korbinian Bachl < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello Kamil, >>> >>> be careful when using this feature in production as there is a race >>> condition meaning it depends on network, browser and client thread count > if >>> it works or not. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- >>>> Von: "Kamil Paśko" <[email protected]> >>>> An: [email protected] >>>> Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Februar 2018 21:31:43 >>>> Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> I could test this "deferred javascript" issue on real application >>>> >>>> >>>>> I'm for a new release too. We have a lot of fixes to release also for >>> 7.x >>>>> branch. >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 3, 2018 11:50 AM, "Martin Grigorov" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 3, 2018 09:03, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea! >>>>>> >>>>>> Not sure if I can do more for the site update :( >>>>>> >>>>>> @Martijn maybe you can provide text for the upcoming release? >>>>>> >>>>>> @All, I'm not real fan of it, but maybe it worth to release another >>> "M"? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it would be better to release another M or RC because there >>> were >>>>>> some bigger changes lately. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> WBR, Maxim >>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018, 16:25 Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've updated copyright year. You don't see 2018 post because it has a >>>>>>> future date, but you can use flag future:true to show it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello All, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have question regarding site generation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have added following file: 2018/_posts/2018-02-12-wicket- >>>>>>>> 8.0.0-released.md >>>>>>>> But news for 2018 are not being generated >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there any debugger I can use? >>>>>>>> Or maybe I miss something? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Copyright year is also 2017 :( >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:09 AM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> > wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Korbinian, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> no problem at all! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> With the new JavaScriptFilteredHeaderResponse we can continue to >>>>>>> improve >>>>>>>>> deferred loading, without having to change anything in Wicket's > core >>>>>>> Ajax >>>>>>>>> handling. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sven >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 01.02.2018 um 17:39 schrieb Korbinian Bachl: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Im really sorry Sven but I broke your defer patch :/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> see comment here: >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A solution to it is provided :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Sven Meier" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> An: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2018 14:15:11 >>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am I right thinking Wicket 1.5 will be discontinued and Wicket6 >>>>>> will >>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> moved to "security updates only" mode? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes I think so. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sven >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet mit Blue >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 1. Feb. 2018, 14:00, um 14:00, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> schrieb: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have created wicket-8 branch in wicket-site repository. >>>>>>>>>>>> I believe the main work should be done in 2018/_posts/ >>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-02-12-wicket-8.0.0-released.md file (I optimistically >>>>>> "guess" >>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>> date to be 2018-02-12 :)) >>>>>>>>>>>> Weanwhile I'll update quickstart generator so it will work with >>>>>>>>>>>> "archetype:generate" 3.0.0+ and snapshot builds >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Am I right thinking Wicket 1.5 will be discontinued and Wicket6 >>>>>> will >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>> moved to "security updates only" mode? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Andrea Del Bene < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've updated Confluence page to elaborate an answer to "Not >>>>>>> blocking >>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> really important" TODOs for Wicket 8. The page is here >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/ToDo+ >>>>>>>>>>>> before+GA+release. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please consider to work directly on my comment >>>>>> integrating/changing >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> content of my post. This should help to come out with a final >>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> our official announcement. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Andrea Del Bene >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just seen it :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2018 20:21, Martin Grigorov wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://dzone.com/articles/would-you-use-jsf-for-your-next-project >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This might be used for inspiration for possible questions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Andrea Del Bene >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've created a Confluence page to collect some ideas on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-technical >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasks we should accomplish before going to roll out Wicket 8. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've >>>>>>>>>>>>> started >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with some personal thoughts on topic 'JS vs Wicket'. Please >>>>>> take >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raw sketch, something to use for further and better exposed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considerations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/ToDo+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before+GA+release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andrea Del Bene >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uh sorry, I'm already able to create/edit pages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Andrea Del Bene < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather use Confluence but I think I don't have enough >>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> create a page. Who can grant them? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Martin Grigorov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can use JIRA for this too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Andrea Del Bene < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could it be a good idea to create a shared document (for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example on >>>>>>>>>>>>> Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Docs) to start working on non-technical questions? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not blocking but really important: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - have a story to answer "Why not just use XXX.js?" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - have a story to answer "Isn't Java Server Side >>>>>> frameworks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dead?" >>>>>>>>>>>>> - have a story to answer "Isn't Java dead" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a call list for when a reporter wants to have >>>>>> contact >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket 8 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and its future (esp. related to questions above) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other things to consider: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://wicketinaction.com >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>
