@Vit, maybe you can share which AdBlocker have you used and how it was configured?
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 18:56, Martijn Dashorst <[email protected]> wrote: > My guess is that if a web font from same origin is blocked, JavaScript > will fail as well. > > Martijn > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:25 PM Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Maybe something like this > > > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1271477/changing-body-font-size-based-on-font-family-with-jquery > > > > can be used? > > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 17:27, Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I've checked uBlock with Firefox and AdBlocker with Chrome, both with > > > default configs, and I see no problem. Obviously IE/Edge always > behaves in > > > its own, peculiar way :-). > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:12 AM Martijn Dashorst < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Well, we did everything well: the fonts are hosted at Apache, not > > > > loaded from external site that tracks their usage (looking at you > > > > fonts.google.com), the SVG even embeds the font file in a data uri. > If > > > > the adblocker then still blocks the font, what can we do? Introduce a > > > > 4MB PNG file? Or should the adblocker at least honor same domain > > > > requests for resources and not block data URI's? > > > > > > > > The font face used for the logo is narrow and there are no web-safe > > > > fonts that render correctly in this instance: I've tried with Arial > > > > Narrow and sans-serif as a fallback: the logo still looks badly > > > > broken. > > > > > > > > AFAIK we can't detect whether someone uses an adblocker that > > > > specifically blocks web fonts, serve them the 8GB binary images, and > > > > serve the rest of the world the 80kb SVG file. > > > > > > > > I understand the need for an adblocker, but when you use one > (wrongly) > > > > you are responsible for when shit breaks. > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:46 AM Vit Rozkovec <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > HI, > > > > > > > > > > please see this screenshot: > > > > > https://screenshots.firefox.com/v4PQv7WIKAv1TiUA/null > > > > > > > > > > This is how is the site visible when you browse it with adblock > that > > > > > blocks also some fonts. > > > > > > > > > > Discovered when one my colleague who is learning Wicket and uses > > > Windows > > > > > wanted to show it to someone else, not a very good first > impression :) > > > > > > > > > > I think it would be good to have a default that displays ok even > when > > > > > fonts are blocked, what do you think? > > > > > > > > > > Have a nice day > > > > > Vit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: > http://wicketinaction.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Andrea Del Bene. > > > Apache Wicket committer. > > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
