Option 3: 1) wait for MS to apply the switch to the chromium engine (ditching the current edge engine completely - see: https://www.computerworld.com/article/3325333/web-browsers/with-move-to-rebuild-edge-atop-googles-chromium-microsoft-raises-white-flag-in-browser-war.html ) 2) relax while doing 1)
IMHO: this is an edge case affecting nearly nobody - since nearly nobody uses edge anyway. It was the worst browser from beginning since MS never put any real work in it and if anyone has a problem he can switch to FF or Chrome or maybe even the 1 user in 10 000 disable his plugins for the wicket page? Better put the time needed into work for wicket; In the end, next week a user of lynx will come and complain the the wicket page isnt as good as expected.... my 2c; PS: I dont know any (!) developer using solely 1 browser anyway - especially since the developer tools in either IE or edge are such useless... Everytime I needed to fix a major IE or EDGE issue in the past it was horrible compared to such a task in FF or Chrome ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Maxim Solodovnik" gmail.com> > An: [email protected] > Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Januar 2019 04:12:33 > Betreff: Re: Wicket site with adblocker @ MS Edge > Hello @Devs, > > I was able to reproduce the issue, and I believe it can be fixed if we will > Option 0: > 1) provide PNG instead of SVG > > Option 1: > 1) check if embedded web font exist using JS > 2) if not will insert PNG image of SVG currently being used > > Option 2: > 1) modify SVG to have circle and crown only > 2) move text and web-font outside SVN to be regular DIV elements > > WDYT? > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 21:29, Vit Rozkovec <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So no extra configuration whatsoever. >> >> úterý 22. ledna 2019 Vit Rozkovec <[email protected]> napsal(a): >> > He had uBlock Original 1.15, configuration status unknown. >> > >> > Wouldn't simple svg fix that? >> > >> > >> > úterý 22. ledna 2019 Maxim Solodovnik gmail.com> napsal(a): >> >> @Vit, maybe you can share which AdBlocker have you used and how it was >> >> configured? >> >> >> >> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 18:56, Martijn Dashorst < >> [email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> My guess is that if a web font from same origin is blocked, JavaScript >> >>> will fail as well. >> >>> >> >>> Martijn >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:25 PM Maxim Solodovnik < >> [email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > Maybe something like this >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1271477/changing-body-font-size-based-on-font-family-with-jquery >> >>> > >> >>> > can be used? >> >>> > >> >>> > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 17:27, Andrea Del Bene [email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > > I've checked uBlock with Firefox and AdBlocker with Chrome, both >> with >> >>> > > default configs, and I see no problem. Obviously IE/Edge always >> >>> behaves in >> >>> > > its own, peculiar way :-). >> >>> > > >> >>> > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:12 AM Martijn Dashorst < >> >>> > > [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Well, we did everything well: the fonts are hosted at Apache, not >> >>> > > > loaded from external site that tracks their usage (looking at you >> >>> > > > fonts.google.com), the SVG even embeds the font file in a data >> uri. >> >>> If >> >>> > > > the adblocker then still blocks the font, what can we do? >> Introduce a >> >>> > > > 4MB PNG file? Or should the adblocker at least honor same domain >> >>> > > > requests for resources and not block data URI's? >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > The font face used for the logo is narrow and there are no >> web-safe >> >>> > > > fonts that render correctly in this instance: I've tried with >> Arial >> >>> > > > Narrow and sans-serif as a fallback: the logo still looks badly >> >>> > > > broken. >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > AFAIK we can't detect whether someone uses an adblocker that >> >>> > > > specifically blocks web fonts, serve them the 8GB binary images, >> and >> >>> > > > serve the rest of the world the 80kb SVG file. >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > I understand the need for an adblocker, but when you use one >> >>> (wrongly) >> >>> > > > you are responsible for when shit breaks. >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Martijn >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:46 AM Vit Rozkovec < >> [email protected] >> >>> > >> >>> > > > wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > HI, >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > please see this screenshot: >> >>> > > > > https://screenshots.firefox.com/v4PQv7WIKAv1TiUA/null >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > This is how is the site visible when you browse it with adblock >> >>> that >> >>> > > > > blocks also some fonts. >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > Discovered when one my colleague who is learning Wicket and >> uses >> >>> > > Windows >> >>> > > > > wanted to show it to someone else, not a very good first >> >>> impression :) >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > I think it would be good to have a default that displays ok >> even >> >>> when >> >>> > > > > fonts are blocked, what do you think? >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > Have a nice day >> >>> > > > > Vit >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > -- >> >>> > > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: >> >>> http://wicketinaction.com >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > -- >> >>> > > Andrea Del Bene. >> >>> > > Apache Wicket committer. >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > -- >> >>> > WBR >> >>> > Maxim aka solomax >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> WBR >> >> Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax
