On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:12 AM Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:02 AM Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:58 AM Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> `clean package` sounds more reasonable to me :)
>>>
>>
>> agreed, but let's change that only once we have a fix/workaround for the
>> problem
>>
>
> it seems it does not break the build, so it is OK to make this change now
> I will do it
>

Done!


>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 15:57, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > `fast` profile skips javadoc ....
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 15:56, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi Emond,
>>> >>
>>> >> Locally while testing new JDK builds I always use: mvn14 clean install
>>> >> -Pfast,java14
>>> >> mvn14 script just exports JAVA_HOME=$JAVA_14_HOME and calls mvn
>>> >> and I don't remember having issues with javadoc since a long time.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:45 AM Emond Papegaaij <
>>> >> [email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Hi all,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I just noticed a problem with building Wicket on JDK 14, which is
>>> not
>>> >> > detected by our current build setup. On JDK 13+, javadoc fails with:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > [ERROR] MavenReportException: Error while generating Javadoc:
>>> >> > Exit code: 1 - javadoc: error - invalid flag:
>>> --no-module-directories
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Command line was: /usr/lib/jvm/java-14-openjdk-amd64/bin/javadoc
>>> >> > -J-Xmx256m -J-Xms128m --no-module-directories @options @packages
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Shouldn't our build detect such issues? At the moment we run 'mvn
>>> >> > clean test'. Maybe we should run 'mvn clean package' instead? I'll
>>> >> > submit a bug report on maven-javadoc-plugin later today. It seems
>>> the
>>> >> > maintainers are not yet aware of this issue.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Best regards,
>>> >> > Emond
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > WBR
>>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>

Reply via email to