I don't use enclosures and component queueing Kind regards, François
> Le 24 avr. 2021 à 20:52, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <reier...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > Hi, > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 2:13 PM Tobias Soloschenko > <tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com.invalid > <mailto:tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com.invalid>> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> from my side I also would prefer removing component queuing (+1), >> enclosures I would prefer a rework and not to remove it (+0). >> >> In addition to Martin’s list I would add some points >> >> — Martin's list — >> 4) Move wicket-http2-servlet4 into core and remove wicket-http2-jetty / >> wicket-http2-tomcat / wicket-http2-undertow / wicket-http2-core (I would >> prefer doing it in 10 over 9) >> 5) May remove wicket-metrics (I have the feeling that this is used rarely >> over other reporting frameworks) >> > > I have the impression the practice before "always" was to move things to > wicket-stuff once they were no longer supported as core features. E.g. > things like treetables and so on. Correct? > > >> kind regards >> >> Tobias >> >>> Am 24.04.2021 um 11:07 schrieb Korbinian Bachl < >> korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de>: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> we dont use queueing but we use enclosures in quite a few places. >> Getting rid of it would mean we have to switch to markup containers holding >> the content and add additonal layer of complexity and boilerplatecode for >> us. >>> >>> Beside that: can wicket 10 finally get rid of jQuery? Since IE is now >> definitely dead I dont see any reason why this is still needed.... >>> >>> Best, >>> KB >>> >>> >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- >>>> Von: "Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro" >>>> An: dev@wicket.apache.org >>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 23. April 2021 12:04:34 >>>> Betreff: Re: Wicket 10 ideas >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:58 AM Sven Meier wrote: >>>> >>>>> x) remove/rework enclosures and component queueing. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It would be interesting to know how many people really use queuing >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Have fun >>>>> Sven >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 02.04.21 13:58, Martin Grigorov wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Now since we have 9.3.0 released is it time to start thinking/working >> on >>>>>> Wicket 10 ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Here are few ideas what to break :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) Move to Servlet 5.x, i.e. jakarta.servlet.** >>>>>> 2) Use @Inject + @Named instead of @SpringBean. If everything is >> covered >>>>>> by @Inject we may deprecate @SpringBean in 9.x >>>>>> 3) Depending on the release date we may even bump Java to 17 (it is >> going >>>>>> to be released this September and it is going to be LTS). I expect >> Wicket >>>>>> 10.0.0 to be released in 1-2 years from now, so by this time Java 17 >>>>> should >>>>>> be mainstream! :-) I know that this is too brave. Most projects still >> use >>>>>> Java 8 for some reason. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Martin >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro >> >> > > -- > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
