On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 at 01:52, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 2:13 PM Tobias Soloschenko > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > from my side I also would prefer removing component queuing (+1), > > enclosures I would prefer a rework and not to remove it (+0). > > > > In addition to Martin’s list I would add some points > > > > — Martin's list — > > 4) Move wicket-http2-servlet4 into core and remove wicket-http2-jetty / > > wicket-http2-tomcat / wicket-http2-undertow / wicket-http2-core (I would > > prefer doing it in 10 over 9) > > 5) May remove wicket-metrics (I have the feeling that this is used rarely > > over other reporting frameworks) > > > > I have the impression the practice before "always" was to move things to > wicket-stuff once they were no longer supported as core features. E.g. > things like treetables and so on. Correct?
I would start dropping wicketstuff modules .... :)) Too much of them > > > > kind regards > > > > Tobias > > > > > Am 24.04.2021 um 11:07 schrieb Korbinian Bachl < > > [email protected]>: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > we dont use queueing but we use enclosures in quite a few places. > > Getting rid of it would mean we have to switch to markup containers holding > > the content and add additonal layer of complexity and boilerplatecode for > > us. > > > > > > Beside that: can wicket 10 finally get rid of jQuery? Since IE is now > > definitely dead I dont see any reason why this is still needed.... > > > > > > Best, > > > KB > > > > > > > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > >> Von: "Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro" > > >> An: [email protected] > > >> Gesendet: Freitag, 23. April 2021 12:04:34 > > >> Betreff: Re: Wicket 10 ideas > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:58 AM Sven Meier wrote: > > >> > > >>> x) remove/rework enclosures and component queueing. > > >>> > > >> > > >> It would be interesting to know how many people really use queuing > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Have fun > > >>> Sven > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 02.04.21 13:58, Martin Grigorov wrote: > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> Now since we have 9.3.0 released is it time to start thinking/working > > on > > >>>> Wicket 10 ? > > >>>> > > >>>> Here are few ideas what to break :-) > > >>>> > > >>>> 1) Move to Servlet 5.x, i.e. jakarta.servlet.** > > >>>> 2) Use @Inject + @Named instead of @SpringBean. If everything is > > covered > > >>>> by @Inject we may deprecate @SpringBean in 9.x > > >>>> 3) Depending on the release date we may even bump Java to 17 (it is > > going > > >>>> to be released this September and it is going to be LTS). I expect > > Wicket > > >>>> 10.0.0 to be released in 1-2 years from now, so by this time Java 17 > > >>> should > > >>>> be mainstream! :-) I know that this is too brave. Most projects still > > use > > >>>> Java 8 for some reason. > > >>>> > > >>>> Regards, > > >>>> Martin > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > > > > > > -- > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro -- Best regards, Maxim
