On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:00, Ross Gardler <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Has this been discussed in a more visible way? That is with a subject "Move 
> Wookie to the Attic?”

It was discussed under a previous reporting period, but not under that heading. 
Good idea to raise visibility of the proposal - I’ll start a new thread.

> 
> I have no objections, but others in the community might.
> 
> Ross
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kris Popat [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2015 8:30 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Wookie report
> 
> Agreed
> 
>> On 5 Oct 2015, at 15:58, Scott Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Here’s my draft report for this month - I’m proposing we retire the project 
>> to the Attic as we haven’t really moved the project forward for some time 
>> now.
>> 
>> ====
>> 
>> Apache Wookie develops software related to implementation of the W3C
>> Widgets family of specifications.
>> 
>> ISSUES
>> As mentioned in previous reports, activity in the project has declined and 
>> is now at a minimum with some questions from users and implementers but 
>> little on the development side and also the community has not grown since 
>> 2013. The reasons for this remain the same, in particular the lack of 
>> non-proprietary adoption of the W3C widget specification.
>> 
>> FUTURE
>> We don’t have any clear use cases that would logically be developed within 
>> the existing Wookie project. While there is potential for work on the new 
>> App Manifest spec, this is more clearly targeted at implementations in web 
>> browsers and mobile runtimes. Likewise the app templating code could be 
>> better taken forward within Cordova rather than Wookie.
>> 
>> We would therefore like to propose that Wookie be moved to the Attic.
>> 
>> RELEASES
>> Wookie 1.0 was released on 24th February 2014.
>> 
>> ACTIVITY
>> Work is still being undertaken on Wookie 2.0.
>> 
>> COMMUNITY
>> Our last committer and PMC member added was Steve Lee on 21st February 2013.
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to