On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Srinath Perera <srin...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi Azeez,
>
> I am not clear how this fits within the big picture? Did you mean to
> use this only for LXC case or for general MT/LB case as well? If yes,
> where we do the MT specific bit?
>

This can be used in any case where you receive messages on one socket,
while internally Tribes is bound to another socket. There is nothing
related to MT here.


>
> --Srinath
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanj...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
> > This is awesome Azeez - much better than adding routes to the LB node!
> >
> > I've been thinking about the network address problem .. what set of IPs
> to
> > use for the LXCs. Using 10.* or 192.168.* requires manual intervention
> > because anything we pick may be an already used network the organization
> ..
> > and those will then become inaccessible to any app running inside an LXC.
> >
> > I looked at 169.254 and it looks like that's an option. See [1][2][3] ..
> its
> > called a "link local" address and it seems like the right thing for us to
> > use. So we'd give say 169.254.99.* for the internal boxes and have
> iptables
> > forward the ports to those. Looks like we can simply bring up the LXC,
> have
> > it pick up whatever IP in the 169.254 range and then add a default route
> to
> > the host IP and register itself with the host (host IP would have to be a
> > boot param).
> >
> > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network
> > [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5735
> > [3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3927
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >
> > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Afkham Azeez <az...@wso2.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have got this working for the well-known membership scheme. Let's test
> >> it with the LXC setup tomorrow. The route addition to the LB machine is
> not
> >> a scalable approach since we will need to do this in all worker node
> >> machines as well since the members in a cluster should be able to
> >> communicate with each other.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Afkham Azeez <az...@wso2.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I just went through the Tribes code and figured out that the local
> member
> >>> host and bind address can be configured to be different values. It is
> the
> >>> localMemberHost that is advertised by Tribes while
> >>> the localMemberBindAddress is the IP address used for binding the
> server
> >>> socket. I will make the necessary changes to Axis2 and inform this
> list. My
> >>> plan is to add a new optional parameter called localMemberBindAddress
> to the
> >>> axis2.xml's clustering section, in addition to the already existing
> >>> localMemberHost. If localMemberBindAddress is not specified, we assume
> that
> >>> it is same as the localMemberHost.
> >>>
> >>> e.g.
> >>>          <parameter name="localMemberHost">10.100.3.67</parameter>
> >>>
> >>>         <parameter
> >>> name="localMemberBindAddress">192.168.1.121</parameter>
> >>>
> >>> Then we have to setup iptables on the physical machine to do port
> >>> forwarding. In this model, we have to make sure that all Carbon
> processes
> >>> started within LXCs have unique ports. Otherwise the port forwarding
> will
> >>> not work.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts welcome.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Afkham Azeez
> >>> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
> >>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
> >>>
> >>> email: az...@wso2.com cell: +94 77 3320919
> >>> blog: http://blog.afkham.org
> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez
> >>> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
> >>>
> >>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Afkham Azeez
> >> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
> >> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
> >>
> >> email: az...@wso2.com cell: +94 77 3320919
> >> blog: http://blog.afkham.org
> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez
> >> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
> >>
> >> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Dev mailing list
> >> Dev@wso2.org
> >> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
> > Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
> > email: sanj...@wso2.com; phone: +94 11 763 9614; cell: +94 77 787 6880| +1
> > 650 265 8311
> > blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/
> >
> >
> > Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev mailing list
> > Dev@wso2.org
> > http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ============================
> Srinath Perera, Ph.D.
>    http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~hperera/
>    http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/
>



-- 
*Afkham Azeez*
Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
* <http://www.apache.org/>**
email: **az...@wso2.com* <az...@wso2.com>* cell: +94 77 3320919
blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>*
twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
*
linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez*
*
*
*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to