On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Kasun Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Friday, March 7, 2014, Afkham Azeez <az...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Worker manager separation is not applicable to all products in the
>> platform. Hence, it is wrong to have an irrelevant parameter in products
>> where this concept does not apply.
>>
>>
> Yes, that's fine Azeez. But if we go with this argument, it's wrong to
> have the GhostDeployment tag in carbon.xml which is only applicable to AS.
> And, whole clustering section in axis2.xml doesn't make sense in products
> like mb, bam etc. isn't it? There are lot of cases like this.
>

Clustering makes sense. If you need to use distributed caching for example,
you need to enable clustering.


>
> I guess this is a trade-off that we have to live with with the wide-range
> of products we have!! It's at least better than the alternative we have
> right now where the user has to be mindful about the use of workerNode
> property. Adding this shows the importance of the property. Wdyt?
>

Just because we may have done certain things in an not so proper way, it
does not give you an excuse to continue to add to that.


>
> Thanks,
> KasunG
>
>
>>
>> Azeez
>>
>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Shall we $subject from Carbon 4.3.0? And then, force the users to enable
>>> workerNode mode by modifying the startup script itself, instead of passing
>>> -DworkerNode=true property via command-line?
>>>
>>> We have noticed that lot of users are passing the said property via the
>>> command-line, but they sometimes miss to set that. That might lead to lot
>>> of issues especially in DepSync. If we set as above, we can lower the human
>>> errors. WDYT?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> KasunG
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Kasun Gajasinghe*
>>> Software Engineer;
>>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>
>>>
>>>  ,
>>> *email: *
>>> *kasung AT spamfree wso2.com <http://wso2.com>   ** cell: **+94 (77)
>>> 678-0813 <%2B94%20%2877%29%20678-0813>*
>>> *linked-in: *http://lk.linkedin.com/in/gajasinghe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *blog: **http://kasunbg.org* <http://kasunbg.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/kasunbg* <http://twitter.com/kasunbg>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dev mailing list
>>> Dev@wso2.org
>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Afkham Azeez*
>> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>> * <http://www.apache.org/>*
>> *email: **az...@wso2.com*
>> * cell: +94 77 3320919 <%2B94%2077%203320919> blog: *
>> *http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>
>> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
>> * linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>*
>>
>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>
>
>
> --
> *Kasun Gajasinghe*
> Software Engineer;
> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>
>
>  ,
> *email: *
> *kasung AT spamfree wso2.com <http://wso2.com>   ** cell: **+94 (77)
> 678-0813 <%2B94%20%2877%29%20678-0813>*
> *linked-in: *http://lk.linkedin.com/in/gajasinghe
>
>
>
> *blog: **http://kasunbg.org* <http://kasunbg.org>
>
>
>
> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/kasunbg* <http://twitter.com/kasunbg>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
*Afkham Azeez*
Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
* <http://www.apache.org/>*
*email: **az...@wso2.com* <az...@wso2.com>
* cell: +94 77 3320919 blog: **http://blog.afkham.org*<http://blog.afkham.org>
*twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
* linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
<http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>*

*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@wso2.org
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to