Yeah, profile=worker is more consistent. The workerNode system property was introduced before Carbon had multiple profile support, and that is the reason it is still retained.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <shame...@wso2.com>wrote: > Hi Azeez/Sameera, > > It is bit confuse as we have workerNode property and profile > property,AFAIK Manger node means carbon runtime with default profile and > worker node mean carbon runtime with worker profile. So what if we remove > this workerNode property and use -Dprofile=worker instead ( or add this to > carbon.xml for the sake of clearness)? . please correct me if i am wrong > here. > > Thanks, > Shameera. > > > On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Afkham Azeez <az...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Kasun Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Friday, March 7, 2014, Afkham Azeez <az...@wso2.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Worker manager separation is not applicable to all products in the >>>> platform. Hence, it is wrong to have an irrelevant parameter in products >>>> where this concept does not apply. >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, that's fine Azeez. But if we go with this argument, it's wrong to >>> have the GhostDeployment tag in carbon.xml which is only applicable to AS. >>> And, whole clustering section in axis2.xml doesn't make sense in products >>> like mb, bam etc. isn't it? There are lot of cases like this. >>> >> >> Clustering makes sense. If you need to use distributed caching for >> example, you need to enable clustering. >> >> >>> >>> I guess this is a trade-off that we have to live with with the >>> wide-range of products we have!! It's at least better than the alternative >>> we have right now where the user has to be mindful about the use of >>> workerNode property. Adding this shows the importance of the property. Wdyt? >>> >> >> Just because we may have done certain things in an not so proper way, it >> does not give you an excuse to continue to add to that. >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> KasunG >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Azeez >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Shall we $subject from Carbon 4.3.0? And then, force the users to >>>>> enable workerNode mode by modifying the startup script itself, instead of >>>>> passing -DworkerNode=true property via command-line? >>>>> >>>>> We have noticed that lot of users are passing the said property via >>>>> the command-line, but they sometimes miss to set that. That might lead to >>>>> lot of issues especially in DepSync. If we set as above, we can lower the >>>>> human errors. WDYT? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> KasunG >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> *Kasun Gajasinghe* >>>>> Software Engineer; >>>>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> , >>>>> *email: * >>>>> *kasung AT spamfree wso2.com <http://wso2.com> ** cell: **+94 (77) >>>>> 678-0813 <%2B94%20%2877%29%20678-0813>* >>>>> *linked-in: *http://lk.linkedin.com/in/gajasinghe >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *blog: **http://kasunbg.org* <http://kasunbg.org> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/kasunbg* <http://twitter.com/kasunbg> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Dev mailing list >>>>> Dev@wso2.org >>>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Afkham Azeez* >>>> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com >>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ >>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>* >>>> *email: **az...@wso2.com* >>>> * cell: +94 77 3320919 <%2B94%2077%203320919> blog: * >>>> *http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org> >>>> *twitter: >>>> **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> >>>> * linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez >>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>* >>>> >>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware* >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Kasun Gajasinghe* >>> Software Engineer; >>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >>> >>> >>> , >>> *email: * >>> *kasung AT spamfree wso2.com <http://wso2.com> ** cell: **+94 (77) >>> 678-0813 <%2B94%20%2877%29%20678-0813>* >>> *linked-in: *http://lk.linkedin.com/in/gajasinghe >>> >>> >>> >>> *blog: **http://kasunbg.org* <http://kasunbg.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/kasunbg* <http://twitter.com/kasunbg> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Afkham Azeez* >> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com >> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ >> * <http://www.apache.org/>* >> *email: **az...@wso2.com* <az...@wso2.com> >> * cell: +94 77 3320919 <%2B94%2077%203320919> blog: * >> *http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org> >> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> >> * linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez >> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>* >> >> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> Dev@wso2.org >> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >> >> > > > -- > *Software Engineer - WSO2 Inc.* > *email: shameera AT wso2.com <shame...@wso2.com> , shameera AT apache.org > <shame...@apache.org>* > *phone: +9471 922 1454 <%2B9471%20922%201454>* > > *Linked in : *http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/shameera-rathnayaka/1a/661/561 > *Twitter : *https://twitter.com/Shameera_R > -- *Afkham Azeez* Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ * <http://www.apache.org/>* *email: **az...@wso2.com* <az...@wso2.com> * cell: +94 77 3320919 blog: **http://blog.afkham.org*<http://blog.afkham.org> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> * linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>* *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
