On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Supun Sethunga <[email protected]> wrote:
> IMO, 0 & 1 is still categorical. Its an equivalent to a encoded string > variable, isn't it? > Question is about what we should name current 'numerical' type. 0, 1 is of course categorical :) > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Nirmal Fernando <[email protected]> wrote: > >> All, >> >> Currently we have; numerical and categorical. But there can be >> categorical features with numerical values for an example if a feature has >> only 0 & 1 we say it's a categorical feature. What should be the >> appropriate names? >> >> -- >> >> Thanks & regards, >> Nirmal >> >> Team Lead - WSO2 Machine Learner >> Associate Technical Lead - Data Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc. >> Mobile: +94715779733 >> Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> > > > -- > *Supun Sethunga* > Software Engineer > WSO2, Inc. > http://wso2.com/ > lean | enterprise | middleware > Mobile : +94 716546324 > -- Thanks & regards, Nirmal Team Lead - WSO2 Machine Learner Associate Technical Lead - Data Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc. Mobile: +94715779733 Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
