Should there be an issue, since we are already considering these type of "numerical" features as categorical?
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Nirmal Fernando <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Supun Sethunga <[email protected]> wrote: > >> IMO, 0 & 1 is still categorical. Its an equivalent to a encoded string >> variable, isn't it? >> > > Question is about what we should name current 'numerical' type. 0, 1 is of > course categorical :) > > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Nirmal Fernando <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> Currently we have; numerical and categorical. But there can be >>> categorical features with numerical values for an example if a feature has >>> only 0 & 1 we say it's a categorical feature. What should be the >>> appropriate names? >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Thanks & regards, >>> Nirmal >>> >>> Team Lead - WSO2 Machine Learner >>> Associate Technical Lead - Data Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc. >>> Mobile: +94715779733 >>> Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Supun Sethunga* >> Software Engineer >> WSO2, Inc. >> http://wso2.com/ >> lean | enterprise | middleware >> Mobile : +94 716546324 >> > > > > -- > > Thanks & regards, > Nirmal > > Team Lead - WSO2 Machine Learner > Associate Technical Lead - Data Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc. > Mobile: +94715779733 > Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ > > > -- Pruthuvi Maheshakya Wijewardena [email protected] +94711228855
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
