Hi All, Have we made a conclusion on this? Are we expecting to make the native dialect configurable? Given that we have claim mapping functionality this won't be a mandatory requirement. But this has the advantage Omindu mentioned against the complexities introduced by letting this configurable for username, groupname etc.
Thanks, On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Omindu Rathnaweera <omi...@wso2.com> wrote: > One of the advantages would be that we can avoid the overhead of claim > transformation. > > Regards, > Omindu. > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Omindu Rathnaweera <omi...@wso2.com> > wrote: > >> Do we need to make the native claim dialect configurable ? AFAIK it is >> not configurable and we are using a hardcoded constant for the dialect URI ( >> http://wso2.org/claims). >> >> >> Regards, >> Omindu >> >> -- >> Omindu Rathnaweera >> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >> Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211> >> > > > > -- > Omindu Rathnaweera > Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. > Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <077%20119%207211> > -- Pushpalanka. -- Pushpalanka Jayawardhana, B.Sc.Eng.(Hons). Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Lanka (pvt) Ltd; wso2.com/ Mobile: +94779716248 Blog: pushpalankajaya.blogspot.com/ | LinkedIn: lk.linkedin.com/in/pushpalanka/ | Twitter: @pushpalanka
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
