Joe, The CURRENT version is 2.7.3, so 2.3.0 is long gone.
Gary On Sat, Jun 22, 2024, 9:45 AM Joseph Kesselman <[email protected]> wrote: > Normal semantic versioning is x.y.z, where changing z means only bug fixes > or documentation changes, y is features added, and x is architectural > changes. So I'd favor 2.3.0. > > But I'd also favor putting out one last 2.2.x with only bug fixes, and > starting 2.3 with the Maven build and feature additions. > > Have we agreed that the 3.0-features-on-a-2.0-base will have their own > namespace, or be in the Xalan namespace, rather than in the XSLT namespace? > > > -- > /_ Joe Kesselman (he/him/his) > -/ _) My Alexa skill for New Music/New Sounds fans: > / https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09WJ3H657/ > > Caveat: Opinionated old geezer with overcompensated writer's block. May > be redundant, verbose, prolix, sesquipedalian, didactic, officious, or > redundant. > ------------------------------ > *From:* Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Saturday, June 22, 2024 7:31:50 AM > *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: Xalan-J release discussion > > I don't think we should release new features in a maintenance release like > 2.7.x. A new feature should be in 2.x.0. Or it maybe be worth saying this > is 3.0 which would happen to match the "3" of XSLT 3. > > I would expect (YMMV) that a new feature release would also contain all > current bug fixes from the 2.7.x branch. > > I think what I am saying is that we need to have a clear and simple story > for users. > > How does the above match with everyone's work and plans? > > Gary > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2024, 6:00 AM Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > Is is ok, if I could make Xalan-J 2.7.4 RC (to release, Xalan-J's > XSLT 3 subset implementation, from dev repos branch xalan-j_xslt3.0) > via Ant build process and make that available on this list for review? > > The document > https://xalan.apache.org/xalan-j/xsl3/xalanj_xslt3.0_implementation_status.pdf > , > has latest description of Xalan-J's current XSLT 3 support. > > As per my analysis, all the XSLT core features are working fine (and > on top of that, we've an XSLT 3 implementation), on the dev repos > branch xalan-j_xslt3.0. > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 7:14 PM Joseph Kesselman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > If here is something you are concerned may no longer be functioning, > please check whether Xalan-Test covers that functionality, and if not > consider adding tests so it does. If something breaks we want to know about > it immediately, preferably before merging. > > > -- > Regards, > Mukul Gandhi > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
