Hi Joseph, On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 7:15 PM Joseph Kesselman <[email protected]> wrote: > Have we agreed that the 3.0-features-on-a-2.0-base will have their own > namespace, or be in the Xalan namespace, rather than in the XSLT namespace?
I still think that, we should keep same the namespace URI of, Xalan-J XSLT 3.0 various instructions that we've implemented. Changing namespace URI of these implemented XSLT 3.0 instructions within Xalan-J, to something else than XSLT namespace, shall need (significant, at-least by me) development effort for changing the implementation and changing namespace URI within all the already implemented XSL 3.0 test cases as well. I think, that the better option can be to wait more before we make any new (the 1st one, I think) Xalan-J XSLT 3.0 release, when you & others are happy with the XSLT 3.0 functional coverage that is there with Xalan-J implementation, and a more better implementation quality. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
