Sorry, but -1 (binding). The LICENSE file is different in the source tarball vs. the binary tarball. In the binary tarball, LICENSE is missing the additional licenses at the bottom after the Apache license. I looked back on RC1, and it had the same problem, but I failed to catch it during the RC1 vote. I looked back on the Yetus 0.1.0 release, and in there, the source and binary tarballs have an identical LICENSE file. That likely indicates something changed in the build and release process after 0.1.0 to cause this.
Actually, I just checked NOTICE, and that has a similar problem too. --Chris Nauroth On 3/3/16, 5:02 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" <[email protected]> wrote: >Artifacts are available: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/yetus/0.2.0-RC2/ > >As of this vote the relevant md5 hashes are: > >MD5 (CHANGES.md) = 268289c713c76238a6e385297ebdb8b6 >MD5 (RELEASENOTES.md) = 777ed0c88a711c8e887061dbaa64e59b >MD5 (yetus-0.2.0-bin.tar.gz) = 9105ffbfb0cae689fc9ede6d6b0dcf8d >MD5 (yetus-0.2.0-src.tar.gz) = 1b41e692df3b349c760f2ab3ae6d2888 > >Source repository commit: df5627009e28f4712f7626a948b02200fb5541b1 > >Our KEYS file is at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/yetus/KEYS >All artifacts are signed with my key (E846DF38) > >JIRA version: http://s.apache.org/yetus-0.2.0-jira > >Please take a few minutes to verify the release[1] and vote on releasing >it: > >[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Yetus 0.2.0 >[ ] +0 no opinion >[ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > >Vote will be subject to Majority Approval[2] and will close at 12:00PM >(noon) >UTC on Monday, March 7th, 2016[3]. > >[1]: http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html >[2]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval >[3]: to find this in your local timezone see: >http://s.apache.org/yetus-0.2.0-rc2-close
