There’s definitely a benefit to keeping the image minimal with as few dependencies as possible. If Ubuntu is impractical for this purpose then it makes sense to evaluate other options. It does seem to me that there are other distros that focus on a minimal footprint, but once all of our dev dependencies are included, is there really much of a difference?
Use for pre-commit implies that it’s a build-base. What makes you think otherwise? -n On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 17:50, Allen Wittenauer <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > I’ve been thinking about this for a while but… should we switch from > Ubuntu containers? I’m hearing that Ubuntu 24 is _way_ bigger and just > pulling the base images seems to confirm that. I know the original idea was > that people would use the Yetus container as their base to build with but I > don’t think that’s really happening. > > Thoughts?
