> On May 5, 2024, at 12:25 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> There’s definitely a benefit to keeping the image minimal with as few
> dependencies as possible. If Ubuntu is impractical for this purpose then it
> makes sense to evaluate other options. It does seem to me that there are
> other distros that focus on a minimal footprint, but once all of our dev
> dependencies are included, is there really much of a difference?
My #1 concern is that Canonical will force some of our dependencies to be snap
loaded in the future.
> Use for pre-commit implies that it’s a build-base. What makes you think
> otherwise?
The projects that I know of that are using Apache Yetus either:
1) Supply their own Dockerfile
2) Use the Github action to just test content and not actually build their end
produt
In both cases, the OS being used for the precommit image is irrelevant.
