On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 05:57PM, moon soo Lee wrote: > Then, would it be fine to just send exactly the same email (except for the > paragraph) to board@ ?
I believe this is what I said, yes. > Regarding wiki, in Zeppelin wiki page, we have draft "Board resolution > (DRAFT) for the graduation > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZEPPELIN/Board+resolution+%28DRAFT%29+for+the+graduation>" > and i think we can just update it. Yeah, shouldn't be an issue. Cos > Regards, > moon > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:37 PM Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Considering that this is a minor wording change that won't affect the scope > > of the project nor the functions of the PMC, you might just resend the > > fixed > > version of the resolution to the board@ and I will add it to their next > > meeting agenda. > > > > I am not sure what wiki do you need to update. > > Cos > > > > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:32AM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: > > > Hi Cos, > > > > > > thank you for pointing it out, removing the paragraph and opt-in for > > > foundation-wise bylaws sounds very reasonable, I think we should do that. > > > > > > Are there any special action items to archive it? (i.e updating the wiki, > > > etc) > > > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Moon, > > > > > > > > I have rised it on the board list, but John has pointed out that this > > > > community won't see that communication. Hence, here it is for the sake > > of > > > > the > > > > wider audience. > > > > > > > > ====================== quoted message ======================== > > > > > > > > With my mentor hat on, I suggest to remove the section about creation > > of > > > > the > > > > bylaws > > > > > > > > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Zeppelin PMC be and hereby is > > > > tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to > > > > encourage open development and increased participation in the > > > > Apache Zeppelin Project; and be it further > > > > > > > > The existing set of the Foundation bylaws is quite sufficient to most > > of > > > > the > > > > project, so you don't need to start with piling rules for the sake of > > the > > > > rules from the get go. A similar discussion had happen either on this > > list > > > > or > > > > on private@incubator.a.o for a few times now. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Cos > > > > > > > > ====================== end of quoted message ======================== > > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
