[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13151136#comment-13151136
 ] 

Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-1239:
-----------------------------------

Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #1366 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/1366/])
    ZOOKEEPER-1239. add logging/stats to identify fsync stalls. (phunt via 
camille)

camille : 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1202360
Files : 
* /zookeeper/trunk/CHANGES.txt
* /zookeeper/trunk/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/zookeeperAdmin.xml
* 
/zookeeper/trunk/src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/server/persistence/FileTxnLog.java

                
> add logging/stats to identify fsync stalls
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1239
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1239
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: server
>            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
>            Assignee: Patrick Hunt
>             Fix For: 3.3.4, 3.4.0, 3.5.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1239_br33.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1239_br34.patch
>
>
> We don't have any logging to identify fsync stalls. It's a somewhat common 
> occurrence (after gc/swap issues) when trying to diagnose pipeline stalls - 
> where outstanding requests start piling up and operational latency increases.
> We should have some sort of logging around this. e.g. if the fsync time 
> exceeds some limit then log a warning, something like that.
> It would also be useful to publish "stat" information related to this. 
> min/avg/max latency for fsync.
> This should also be exposed through JMX.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to