+1 on moving to JDK 7 I have been through this decision a few times now. The first time I was -1 (eventually -0), the second time +0 and lately I am +1 on this change.
ZK probably can't move to require JDK7, but 7 really is better. On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > We should probably also move to java7 as our "preferred" jvm. e.g. > devs should use that as the default for development, move our jenkins > over to that for most jobs, etc... (continue to support jdk6 though) > > Patrick > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it was > > pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for monitoring) > > should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair. > > > > I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues. > > > > Patrick > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Stefan, > >> > >> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery API > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what the > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]). > >>> > >> > >> I think as of now the biggest blocker is: > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147 > >> > >> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation and an > >> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates when > >> enabling local sessions. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> -rgs >
