w.r.t. ZK-107, there are two open issues: - ZOOKEEPER-1659 (JMX support for reconfiguration) not sure its necessary for 3.5.0, but it would be good if someone familiar with JMX looks into this. - ZOOKEEPER-1699 which seems serious as it gets the system stuck. I hope to spend more time on this soon.
Regarding documentation, there is a draft here: ZOOKEEPER-1660 Alex On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on moving to JDK 7 > > I have been through this decision a few times now. The first time I was -1 > (eventually -0), the second time +0 and lately I am +1 on this change. > > ZK probably can't move to require JDK7, but 7 really is better. > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We should probably also move to java7 as our "preferred" jvm. e.g. >> devs should use that as the default for development, move our jenkins >> over to that for most jobs, etc... (continue to support jdk6 though) >> >> Patrick >> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it was >> > pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for monitoring) >> > should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair. >> > >> > I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues. >> > >> > Patrick >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Stefan, >> >> >> >> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode >> (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery API >> ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what the >> release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion >> about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]). >> >>> >> >> >> >> I think as of now the biggest blocker is: >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147 >> >> >> >> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation and an >> >> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates when >> >> enabling local sessions. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> -rgs >>
