Any updates? Are we comfortable getting this cut? Thanks, C
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Camille Fournier <cami...@apache.org>wrote: > Yeah I think we should put a bullet in this. > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>wrote: > >> Should we move ZOOKEEPER-1833 to 3.4.7 now and get 3.4.6 out? >> >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu> >> wrote: >> > +1 >> > >> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> +1, great idea re setting a deadline now that we're close (keep in >> >> mind we an always do further fix releases). Kudos on the windows work, >> >> love to see it! >> >> >> >> Patrick >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Camille Fournier <cami...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >> >>> On Jan 11, 2014 10:18 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fpjunque...@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> We only have one blocker for 3.4.6 now which is ZOOKEEPER-1833. I'd >> like >> >>>> to get the windows build to pass on jenkins, and we have made a lot >> of >> >>>> progress already. Although we have focused on the windows build, >> most of >> >>>> the changes were small bugs that don't manifest as easily in other >> >>>> platforms, so it has been a chance to clean up the test cases. >> Thanks a lot >> >>>> for the great community work, Germán, Rakesh, Michi et al. >> >>>> >> >>>> To avoid postponing the 3.4.6 release even further, it sounds like a >> good >> >>>> idea to put a deadline on ZOOKEEPER-1833. I would say that if we >> don't have >> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1833 done by the end of January, we should cut a release >> and push >> >>>> some of the work to 3.4.7. Any concern here? >> >>>> >> >>>> -Flavio >> > >
