I have started the process but I haven't had a solid block of time to do it. 
I'll be producing an rc soon, though.

-Flavio




On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 1:21 AM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]> 
wrote:
 
Any updates? Are we comfortable getting this cut?
>
>Thanks,
>C
>
>
>
>On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Yeah I think we should put a bullet in this.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Should we move ZOOKEEPER-1833 to 3.4.7 now and get 3.4.6 out?
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> +1, great idea re setting a deadline now that we're close (keep in
>>> >> mind we an always do further fix releases). Kudos on the windows work,
>>> >> love to see it!
>>> >>
>>> >> Patrick
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> +1
>>> >>> On Jan 11, 2014 10:18 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> We only have one blocker for 3.4.6 now which is ZOOKEEPER-1833. I'd
>>> like
>>> >>>> to get the windows build to pass on jenkins, and we have made a lot
>>> of
>>> >>>> progress already. Although we have focused on the windows build,
>>> most of
>>> >>>> the changes were small bugs that don't manifest as easily in other
>>> >>>> platforms, so it has been a chance to clean up the test cases.
>>> Thanks a lot
>>> >>>> for the great community work, Germán, Rakesh, Michi et al.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> To avoid postponing the 3.4.6 release even further, it sounds like a
>>> good
>>> >>>> idea to put a deadline on ZOOKEEPER-1833. I would say that if we
>>> don't have
>>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1833 done by the end of January, we should cut a release
>>> and push
>>> >>>> some of the work to 3.4.7. Any concern here?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -Flavio
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to