There are several large PAs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1172 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1346 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1607 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907
I think I can review ZOOKEEPER-1907 and get it in for 3.5.0, but we need shepherds for the other 3 JIRAs. Let me know if anybody has cycles to review and check in these patches. Otherwise I'll push them out of 3.5.0. Thanks! --Michi On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Shraer <[email protected]> wrote: > right - looks like there's a patch there, waiting for review. > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> On 20 March 2014 13:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > what about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807? >> > >> >> More context: people trying to use Observers in 3.5.0 without that fixed >> will have issues, for sure. >> >> >> -rgs >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -rgs >> > >> > >> > On 20 March 2014 13:48, Alexander Shraer <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> thanks Patrick! >> >> >> >> regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers: >> >> - add JMX support >> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1659<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659> >> >> ) >> >> - change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no quorum of >> >> last >> >> proposed configuration >> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1699<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699> >> >> ) >> >> >> >> any help with either is greatly appreciated. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm >> >> > assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't >> >> > hold up releasing a 3.5.0. >> >> > >> >> > We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what >> >> > we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts? >> >> > >> >> > A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out >> >> > what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else >> >> > has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be >> >> > helpful. >> >> > >> >> > Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!): >> >> > http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF >> >> > >> >> > There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do >> >> > with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA. >> >> > >> >> > There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0: >> http://bit.ly/PV21NA >> >> > >> >> > Patrick >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira < >> >> [email protected]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > Sure, fine with me. >> >> > > >> >> > > -Flavio >> >> > > >> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <[email protected] >> > >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio? >> >> > >> >> >> > >> thanks >> >> > >> mahadev >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at >> >> doing >> >> > >>> a release? >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> Patrick >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar < >> >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk. >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> Hopefully today/tomm. >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> thanks >> >> > >>>> mahadev >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira < >> >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM >> >> for >> >> > 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6. >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> -Flavio >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it >> >> was >> >> > >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for >> >> > monitoring) >> >> > >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair. >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues. >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> Patrick >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés >> >> > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>> Hi Stefan, >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>> Hi, >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode >> >> > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery >> API >> >> > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what >> the >> >> > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion >> >> > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]). >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is: >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147 >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation >> >> and an >> >> > >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates >> >> when >> >> > >>>>>>> enabling local sessions. >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> Cheers, >> >> > >>>>>>> -rgs >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >>
