I see some great progress in closing out jiras. Kudos all. We currently have 12 blockers for 3.5.0, 5 are listed as PA. Let's keep plugging away on these.
The CI environment has gone a bit red of late. On my personal servers I'm seeing it mostly in "startSingleServerTest" though, so perhaps it's localized. Would be good to nail down the flakey tests. I'll try looking into this more (what the flakeys are) and report back. Apache CI seems a bit unstable of late (the jenkins env I mean) I'm thinking we might start creating some Alpha releases, e.g. zookeeper-3.5.0-alpha so that we can get the code into folks hands. They can try it out and give us feedback. It would be alpha quality though, not for production. APIs and new functionality might still change in a non-backward compatible way. We could do this even though we still have some blockers remaining. Once all the blockers are resolved we could move to "beta" status. The APIs, etc... would then be locked. Once things settle out during the beta cycle we could then move off "beta". We'd only make 3.5 "stable" once we feel comfortable with it's quality and after collecting feedback from the community. This is basically what we did for 3.4 branch (and similar to what some other projects do). What do you think? Patrick On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <[email protected]> wrote: > ... there is one more. I just canceled it because the patch needs to be > rebased. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1794 > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <[email protected]> wrote: >> There are several large PAs: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1172 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1346 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1607 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907 >> >> >> I think I can review ZOOKEEPER-1907 and get it in for 3.5.0, but we >> need shepherds for the other 3 JIRAs. Let me know if anybody has >> cycles to review and check in these patches. Otherwise I'll push them >> out of 3.5.0. >> >> Thanks! >> --Michi >> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Shraer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> right - looks like there's a patch there, waiting for review. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés >>> <[email protected] >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 20 March 2014 13:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > what about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807? >>>> > >>>> >>>> More context: people trying to use Observers in 3.5.0 without that fixed >>>> will have issues, for sure. >>>> >>>> >>>> -rgs >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -rgs >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On 20 March 2014 13:48, Alexander Shraer <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> thanks Patrick! >>>> >> >>>> >> regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers: >>>> >> - add JMX support >>>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1659<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659> >>>> >> ) >>>> >> - change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no quorum of >>>> >> last >>>> >> proposed configuration >>>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1699<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699> >>>> >> ) >>>> >> >>>> >> any help with either is greatly appreciated. >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> > I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm >>>> >> > assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't >>>> >> > hold up releasing a 3.5.0. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what >>>> >> > we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts? >>>> >> > >>>> >> > A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out >>>> >> > what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else >>>> >> > has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be >>>> >> > helpful. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!): >>>> >> > http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF >>>> >> > >>>> >> > There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do >>>> >> > with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0: >>>> http://bit.ly/PV21NA >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Patrick >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira < >>>> >> [email protected]> >>>> >> > wrote: >>>> >> > > Sure, fine with me. >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > -Flavio >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <[email protected] >>>> > >>>> >> > wrote: >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio? >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> thanks >>>> >> > >> mahadev >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> >>>> >> > wrote: >>>> >> > >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at >>>> >> doing >>>> >> > >>> a release? >>>> >> > >>> >>>> >> > >>> Patrick >>>> >> > >>> >>>> >> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar < >>>> >> > [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk. >>>> >> > >>>> >>>> >> > >>>> Hopefully today/tomm. >>>> >> > >>>> >>>> >> > >>>> thanks >>>> >> > >>>> mahadev >>>> >> > >>>> >>>> >> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira < >>>> >> > [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM >>>> >> for >>>> >> > 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6. >>>> >> > >>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>> -Flavio >>>> >> > >>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it >>>> >> was >>>> >> > >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for >>>> >> > monitoring) >>>> >> > >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair. >>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues. >>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>>> Patrick >>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés >>>> >> > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>>>>> Hi Stefan, >>>> >> > >>>>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode >>>> >> > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery >>>> API >>>> >> > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what >>>> the >>>> >> > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion >>>> >> > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]). >>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is: >>>> >> > >>>>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147 >>>> >> > >>>>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation >>>> >> and an >>>> >> > >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates >>>> >> when >>>> >> > >>>>>>> enabling local sessions. >>>> >> > >>>>>>> >>>> >> > >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>> >> > >>>>>>> -rgs >>>> >> > >>>>> >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>>
