[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326968#comment-14326968
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1907:
--------------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12699605/ZOOKEEPER-1907.patch
against trunk revision 1658888.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 15 new or modified tests.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3)
warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
-1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests.
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2521//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2521//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2521//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Improve Thread handling
> -----------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1907
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: server
> Affects Versions: 3.5.0
> Reporter: Rakesh R
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Fix For: 3.5.1, 3.6.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-1907.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1907.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-1907.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1907.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1907.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-1907.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1907.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1907.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-1907.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1907.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1907.patch
>
>
> Server has many critical threads running and co-ordinating each other like
> RequestProcessor chains et. When going through each threads, most of them
> having the similar structure like:
> {code}
> public void run() {
> try {
> while(running)
> // processing logic
> }
> } catch (InterruptedException e) {
> LOG.error("Unexpected interruption", e);
> } catch (Exception e) {
> LOG.error("Unexpected exception", e);
> }
> LOG.info("...exited loop!");
> }
> {code}
> From the design I could see, there could be a chance of silently leaving the
> thread by swallowing the exception. If this happens in the production, the
> server would get hanged forever and would not be able to deliver its role.
> Now its hard for the management tool to detect this.
> The idea of this JIRA is to discuss and imprv.
> Reference: [Community discussion
> thread|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/zookeeper-user/201403.mbox/%3cc2496325850aa74c92aaf83aa9662d26458a1...@szxeml561-mbx.china.huawei.com%3E]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
