I might not be available to test RC4, so I decided to test RC3 now under the assumption that the only incremental change in RC4 will be the ZOOKEEPER-2235 licensing fix.
+1 (non-binding and pending resolution of ZOOKEEPER-2235) - Downloaded tarball and verified signature and checksum. - Deployed a 3-node cluster. - Tested various zkCli commands. - Tested 4-letter words through both plain TCP server and HTTP Admin Server. - Killed the leader and verified a new leader was elected among the remaining 2 nodes. - ZOOKEEPER-1077: Confirmed native client builds on Solaris. - ZOOKEEPER-1660: Tested dynamic reconfiguration by following this new documentation. - ZOOKEEPER-2178: Confirmed native client builds on Windows. - ZOOKEEPER-2183: Ran successful concurrent tests with 100% pass rate. - ZOOKEEPER-2185: Confirmed server runs with -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError and -XX:OnOutOfMemoryError='kill %p' by default. - ZOOKEEPER-2198: Confirmed JUnit runs with one thread by default. --Chris Nauroth On 7/19/15, 8:45 AM, "Ivan Kelly" <iv...@apache.org> wrote: >I you have time to check this release, and dont foresee that you'll have >time to check the next rc as in depth, I'd go ahead and check this one. If >the licensing issue is the only problem (it seems to be all that has been >raised this vote), the all that needs to be fixed and checked in the next >rc is the licensing, which is a quick check. > >-Ivan > >On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 4:20 PM Flavio P JUNQUEIRA <f...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Please see the discussion here, Camille: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2235 >> >> -Flavio >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Camille Fournier <cami...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > I'm checking out the tag to do a check. Do we need to do anything with >> > Ivan's -1? I don't want to spend time checking a release that can't >>move >> > forward due to a -1. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > C >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Flavio Junqueira < >> > flavio.junque...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > That's a good observation. The description here about what NOTICE >> should >> > > contain: >> > > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html < >> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html> >> > > >> > > says to be careful and not add unnecessarily. Having said that, the >> jars >> > > are under Apache 2.0, except these: >> > > >> > > - jline which has a license file under lib, I don't think we need to >> add >> > > it to the NOTICE file >> > > - slf4j has an MIT license and the license says that the copyright >> notice >> > > and the permission notice need to be included. We need to copy the >> > license >> > > under lib just like we did for jline, but again I don't think we >>need >> to >> > > copy it over as per the description I cited above >> > > - servlet-api needs an addition to NOTICE, see the discussion in >> > > LUCENE-4431 >> > > >> > > If I haven't missed anything, we need to add two license files and >>make >> > > one addition to NOTICE.txt. >> > > >> > > That's the longest release process ever in this project! >> > > >> > > -Flavio >> > > >> > > > On 16 Jul 2015, at 12:41, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Hi Michi, >> > > > >> > > > -1 >> > > > >> > > > The tarball contains a bunch of jars(under lib), but there is no >> > mention >> > > of >> > > > these in the NOTICE file. Perhaps phunt knows whether this is ok, >>but >> > my >> > > > understanding is that if you are distributing the binaries, you >>need >> to >> > > > mention them in the NOTICE. >> > > > >> > > > Apart from that the release looks good. I tested against midonet >>(my >> > > > companies product), wrote a small test app, ran the tests. All >>looked >> > > fine. >> > > > >> > > > -Ivan >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:15 PM Michi Mutsuzaki >><mutsuz...@gmail.com >> > >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> We have received 2 binding +1s so far (Flavio, Michi). I'm >>extending >> > > >> the voting period to give other PMCs some more time to vote. >>Please >> > > >> vote by July 20th 2015, 23:59 UTC+0. >> > > >> >> > > >> Thanks! >> > > >> --Michi >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Rakesh R <rake...@huawei.com> >> wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> +1 >> > > >>> >> > > >>> - Built from source. >> > > >>> - Ran unit tests and tested few shell cmds, JMX attributes, >>basic >> > > >> watcher behaviors. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Thanks Michi for making the release! >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Best Regards, >> > > >>> Rakesh >> > > >>> >> > > >>> -----Original Message----- >> > > >>> From: Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés [mailto:r...@itevenworks.net] >> > > >>> Sent: 10 July 2015 11:42 >> > > >>> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org >> > > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.1-alpha >>candidate >> 3 >> > > >>> >> > > >>> +1 >> > > >>> >> > > >>> My testing was: >> > > >>> * 3 participants + 2 observers using systemd-nspawn >> > > >>> * triggered elections >> > > >>> * ran some smoke tests with zk-shell along with more elections >> > > >>> >> > > >>> All looks good. Thanks Michi! >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> -rgs >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> On 9 July 2015 at 15:23, Hongchao Deng >><fengjingc...@hotmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> +1.Ran unit test and some basic programs. It went pretty >> > smooth.Thanks >> > > >>>> Michi! >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> - Hongchao Deng >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>>> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:09:44 -0700 >> > > >>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.1-alpha >> candidate >> > 3 >> > > >>>>> From: mutsuz...@gmail.com >> > > >>>>> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> Just a reminder, the vote is closing in about two days, and we >> > > >>>>> haven't received enough binding votes yet. Please vote when >>you >> > get a >> > > >> chance. >> > > >>>>> Thanks! >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki >> > > >>>>> <mutsuz...@gmail.com> >> > > >>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>> +1 >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> - Ran ant test on ubuntu. >> > > >>>>>> - Compiled the c client on mac. >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira >> > > >>>>>> <fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>> +1, I ran tests, checked license and notice files, ran >>release >> > > >>>>>>> +audit >> > > >>>> to make sure that rat had no issues to report. >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> -Flavio >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> On 28 Jun 2015, at 08:47, Michi Mutsuzaki < >> mutsuz...@gmail.com> >> > > >>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> This is the fourth release candidate for 3.5.1-alpha. This >> > > >>>>>>>> candidate fixes the c client compilation error on os x >>found >> in >> > > >>>>>>>> the previous candidate. The full release notes is available >> at: >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310 >> > > >>>> 801&version=12326786 >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and vote by July 11th 2015, 23:59 >> > UTC+0. >> > > >>>> *** >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Source files: >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~michim/zookeeper-3.5.1-alpha-candidate >> > > >>>>>>>> -3/ >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Maven staging repo: >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookee >> > > >>>> per/zookeeper/3.5.1-alpha/ >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon: >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/tags/release-3.5.1-rc >> > > >>>>>>>> 3/ >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign >>the >> > > >> release: >> > > >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Should we release this candidate? >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >>
