Right, we moved to a git repo when the project became TLP: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8701 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8701>
-Flavio > On 10 Mar 2016, at 17:12, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hm, that seems to be about github integration, see this for what > lucene/solr recently did: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11056 "Migrate Lucene > project from SVN to Git." > > I'm also +1 for git. > > Patrick > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: >> Here is the infra ticket for bookkeeper: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10679 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10679> >> >> -Flavio >> >>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 16:27, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <r...@itevenworks.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I am +1 on moving to git as well. >>> >>> What did it take for other Apache projects? >>> >>> -rgs >>> On Mar 10, 2016 7:09 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <f...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I'd like to move to git... >>>> >>>> -Flavio >>>> >>>>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 15:07, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I could see us turning it on if we move to git as our source repo. >>>>> However I'm recommending we turn it _off_ until then. Interestingly >>>>> there's a discussion going on right now in apache infra about this >>>>> (github mirrors and PRs), I'll let you know. >>>>> >>>>> That said, is there any interest to move to git and drop svn? I'd like >>>>> to move personally, hadoop moved a while back and lucene/solr just >>>>> moved recently. I think it's a pretty well worn path if we're >>>>> interested to do so. >>>>> >>>>> Patrick >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> I did mean turning it on, which is apparently the opposite of what Pat >>>> is proposing. Sorry about the confusion. =) >>>>>> >>>>>> -Flavio >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 08:01, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <r...@itevenworks.net> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 9, 2016 11:26 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <f...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 for accepting requesting to infra to accept PRs via github. We've >>>> done >>>>>>> the transition in BookKeeper and have been doing it in Kafka for a >>>> while, >>>>>>> it works pretty well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wait - you mean the other way around? Pat suggested turning off PRs in >>>>>>> github... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -rgs >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm happy you brought this up, Pay, I've been thinking about it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Flavio >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:38, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi folks. If you look on github.com you'll see a number of pull >>>>>>>>> request (41 atm) that are effectively in limbo given we don't accept >>>>>>>>> pull requests that way: >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> rather through our Jira process >>>>>>>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> someday we might move to git, but for the time being it seems like we >>>>>>>>> should do something about this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I was thinking about contacting Apache infra and asking them if they >>>>>>>>> can turn off accepting pull requests at github.com, just wanted to >>>>>>>>> check with dev@ to see if this makes sense or do folks want to do >>>>>>>>> something else? If I don't hear back anything negative in the next >>>> few >>>>>>>>> days I'll ping infra about shutting down acceptance of pull requests >>>>>>>>> (may not be possible but I'll check). I'm not talking about removing >>>>>>>>> the mirror to be clear, just shutting down accepting pull requests on >>>>>>>>> the mirror. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Patrick >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ps. regardless we probably need to get back to everyone and ask them >>>>>>>>> to follow the HTC page.... I don't seem to be able to close out the >>>>>>>>> PRs, just comment on them, so that's going to be a possible issue as >>>>>>>>> well.... arg. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>
