[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15332795#comment-15332795
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1045:
-----------------------------------------
Question: do we need to distinguish between QuorumServer/QuorumClient and
"Server" - the existing Server that we already need in the jaas.conf in order
to support Client->Server communication (ZooKeeper object clients I'm talking
about here, the traditional client, vs the "server client).
What's the benefit of breaking out (adding) QuroumServer and QuorumClient vs
just using the existing "Server"?
> Quorum Peer mutual authentication
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1045
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1045
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: server
> Reporter: Eugene Koontz
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.4.9, 3.5.3
>
> Attachments: 0001-ZOOKEEPER-1045-br-3-4.patch,
> 1045_failing_phunt.tar.gz, ZK-1045-test-case-failure-logs.zip,
> ZOOKEEPER-1045-00.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1045-Rolling Upgrade Design Proposal.pdf,
> ZOOKEEPER-1045-br-3-4.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1045-br-3-4.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-1045-br-3-4.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1045-br-3-4.patch
>
>
> ZOOKEEPER-938 addresses mutual authentication between clients and servers.
> This bug, on the other hand, is for authentication among quorum peers.
> Hopefully much of the work done on SASL integration with Zookeeper for
> ZOOKEEPER-938 can be used as a foundation for this enhancement.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
