[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15339198#comment-15339198
]
Rakesh R commented on ZOOKEEPER-1045:
-------------------------------------
bq. Would we recommend that folks use the same credentials for
Server/QuorumServer/QuorumClient? Or should they use different for each?
All three can use same credentials. I couldn't see any problem in sharing the
credentials. But IMHO we can recommend to use different credentials for
client-server(Server) and server-server
communications(QuorumServer/QuorumClient) in order to clearly separate the
communication paths. Whats your opinion?
For the previous comment, to avoid confusions about the "server client, should
I modify {{QuorumClient}} to {{QuorumLearner}}?
> Quorum Peer mutual authentication
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1045
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1045
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: server
> Reporter: Eugene Koontz
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.4.9, 3.5.3
>
> Attachments: 0001-ZOOKEEPER-1045-br-3-4.patch,
> 1045_failing_phunt.tar.gz, ZK-1045-test-case-failure-logs.zip,
> ZOOKEEPER-1045-00.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1045-Rolling Upgrade Design Proposal.pdf,
> ZOOKEEPER-1045-br-3-4.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1045-br-3-4.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-1045-br-3-4.patch, ZOOKEEPER-1045-br-3-4.patch
>
>
> ZOOKEEPER-938 addresses mutual authentication between clients and servers.
> This bug, on the other hand, is for authentication among quorum peers.
> Hopefully much of the work done on SASL integration with Zookeeper for
> ZOOKEEPER-938 can be used as a foundation for this enhancement.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
