I checked https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/192 and it looks good. I'd appreciate if other committers can take a look at this, and test it.
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < [email protected]> wrote: > I'll work on a 3.5 port regardless. If folks have issues they can comment > on the ticket. > > -JZ > > > On Mar 12, 2017, at 10:27 AM, Michael Han <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If the goal is to get this TTL feature in an upcoming release then I'd > say > > back port it to 3.5 is more realistic. We are in middle of release but I > > think the patch should be able to make in, if the back port can be done > > next week. > > > > My only concern is that this feature is missing C client work. So we will > > release a new feature that only has Java client. I assume this is not a > big > > deal, but I thought I should hear what others think about this. > > > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> If 3.6 isn't coming anytime soon maybe I can port TTLs to 3.5. Any > >> objections to that? > >> > >> -Jordan > >> > >>> On Mar 12, 2017, at 8:46 AM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> I had volunteered to manage it, but I got no cycles at all in the past > >> 2-3 months. We are also a bit late with the other 3.4 and 3.5 releases, > >> which helped with getting it delayed. I agree otherwise that it would be > >> great to have it sooner rather than later, though. > >>> > >>> -Flavio > >>> > >>>> On 11 Mar 2017, at 23:02, Jordan Zimmerman < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Is there any idea of date for 3.6.0? We really need TTL nodes and have > >> resorted to a fork internally to get it. I know that 3.5.x is the > current > >> focus but at this rate how long, realistically, would we have 3.6.0? > >>>> > >>>> -Jordan > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Cheers > > Michael. > > -- Cheers Michael.
