[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16052818#comment-16052818
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-1782:
-------------------------------------------
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/282
@hanm Thanks for the review. I think I have addressed all of your review
comments. I originally put the patch up in 2013 and I have not touched it
since so I honestly don't remember a lot about why I made the test that way to
begin with.
> zookeeper.superUser is not as super as superDigest
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-1782
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1782
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.4.5
> Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
> Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
> Attachments: zk-1782.patch, zk-1782.patch
>
>
> The zookeeper.superUser system property does not fully grant super user
> privileges, like zookeeper.DigestAuthenticationProvider.superDigest does.
> zookeeper.superUser only has as many privileges as the sasl ACLs on the znode
> being accessed. This means that if a znode only has digest ACLs
> zookeeper.superUser is ignored. Or if a znode has a single sasl ACL that
> only has read privileges zookeeper.superUser only has read privileges.
> The reason for this is that SASLAuthenticationProvider implements the
> superUser check in the matches method, instead of having the super user
> include a new Id("super","") as Digest does.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
